Psychology
247 Cognitive Psychology
Erwin Segal
Return to syllabus
Study Guide for Final
The Emphasis of the final exam is
on the last four chapters, but there will be some questions from the rest
of the class. Only highlights from the previous chapters will be queried.
If you studied for the previous exams, read the book, or attended classes
and paid any attention at all, and remember anything, you should do reasonably
well with the highlights section of the exam. The latter part of the exam
will be covered in somewhat more detail, but there will be an attempt to
write questions as broadly as possible. The exam will consist of multiple
choice questions. As a exam taker, you should be aware that you should
read each question and the alternatives carefully. If you know the material
tested it should be possible in most cases (I try for all, but I am not
perfect) to see that one answer is clearly better than the others. Every
attempt is made to make the questions all straight-forward and unambiguous,
with one answer correct and the others all incorrect.
The questions on the exam will
be on these topics
-
What is information? (pattern of stimulation)
-
What is information processing? (the
successive transfer, storage and modification of information as activity
progresses from one place to another)
-
What are neurons? (brain cells; the
functional components of nerves and neural tracts; the basic units of the
nervous system that transmit information from one part of the nervous system
to another)
-
About how many synapses are there on
each neuron in the Central Nervous System? (From 1000 to 10,000 and maybe
more)
-
How is information regulated by properties
of neurons? (different levels of neurotransmitters in the synapses; activation
of varying numbers of synapses; having both excitatory and inhibitory synapses
connected to a given neuron)
-
How does the size of the cerebral cortex
in humans compare to that of most other organisms? (It is larger absolutely
and a greater percentage of brain weight)
-
What are some of the major differences
of function associated with different brain areas? (Visual perception,
short term memory, motor activity, sensory reception, language comprehension,
planning, analytic reasoning, holistic perception)
-
What is the Church-Turing Thesis all
about? (computational systems with relatively simple sets of operators
seem to be able to be programmed to do any specifiable reasoning task)
-
What theoretical limitations are there
on computers that show that humans can solve problems computers cannot?
(there are no known ones)
-
What are some of the principles by
which sensory stimuli are organized? (groupings by common fate, similarity,
proximity, good continuation, simplicity, and other Gestalt propertes)
-
By what kind of mechanism might you
recognize a letter in a word context better than in a random letter context?
(Top-down processing--Partial word identification helps recognition of
its component letters)
-
What are some examples of the influence
of stimulus context on perceptual identification? (Eyes, noses, mouths
in face context; H in 'THE' context and A in 'CAT' context)
-
Give an example of attention inhibiting
some perception. (Cocktail party phenomena; dichotic listening tasks)
-
Give an example of attention and/or
expectation inhibiting or directing perceptual memory. (Neisser's study
of following a basketball game superimposed on a child's hand game on a
TV screen)
-
How does research on identifying a
T in a Y
context support the reality of perceptual features? (T is identified faster
among I's and Y's
than among I's and Z's
because the feature 'horizontal' can guide the search.)
-
What is automaticity in perceptual
processing? How does the Stroop effect illustrate this? (Subjects cannot
avoid reading the word in attempting to identify the ink color)
Properties of visual representations
-
What is some evidence that visual imagery
is really similar to visual perception? (Activation of the same brain regions;
selectively interfered with by visual tasks)
-
What is some evidence that visual imagery
is not like a photograph, it can be transformed? (mental rotation in third
dimension,
-
What is some evidence that visual imagery
is not like a photograph, it is meaningfully parsed? We forget meaningful
components rather than physical parts of the image)
Properties of sentential representations
-
What is some evidence that sentences
are remembered more for meaning than for form? (Recognize variations in
form that alter meaning better than variations in form that do not)
-
What is some evidence that separate
sentences that are meaningfully related are remembered as integrated units?
(Bransford experiment that different sentences such as "The ant ate the
jelly" and "the jelly was sweet" are remembered as a single unit.)
-
What is some evidence that schemata
(schemas [sic]) help shape memory for verbal input? (Bartlett's indian
war party story, Dooling's Christopher Columbus story, Pompi and Lachman's
cancer operation story, Bransford's minstrel story, etc.)
-
What evidence is there that categories
have internal structure? (Rosch's latency differences in categorization
tasks; Labov's categorization of cups and bowls differing as a function
of what is in them)
-
What evidence is there that meaning
can affect Short Term Memory? (Wicken's Recovery from proaction)
-
What evidence is there that STM and
LTM are different phenomena? (limited capacity, differentially affected
by brain damage and psychiatric syndromes)
-
What evidence is there that we have
some memory even when there is no recall? (Savings or relearning rate is
less than the original learning rate)
-
What evidence is there that implicit
and explicit memory are different? ( One can show improvement in performance
on certain tasks based on previous experience when there is no evidence
of awareness of the previous experience, even among Korsikoff and other
amnesic patients)
-
How does priming studies support the
claim that memory is organized? (words that are associated with one another
or meaningfully related will lead to faster recognition of the related
words)
-
What are the components of a problem
space? (Initial state, goal state, intermediate states, and operators (rules
of transition from state to state))
-
Why is random trial and error often
a bad strategy in problem solving? (Most problems have many states so the
likelihood of finding the right path to the goal by random trial and error
is very small)
-
What is the most likely initial strategy
used by novice problem solvers when given a problem? (Hill climbing or
difference reduction)
-
What is the major limitation of hill
climbing as a heuristic or strategy? (There are often local maxima in a
problem. When they are reached the strategy is at an impasse)
-
What is means-ends analysis? (The attempt
to find sub-goals from which the goal of the problem can be reached and
then work backwards to find successive subgoals until there is one that
can be reached from the initial state)
-
Why is the specific representation of a problem important?
(If the initial state, the goal state and the operators do not have appropriate
structural relations the problem will be difficult if not impossible to
solve. With the right representation sometimes the solution to the problem
jumps out at the problem solver (insight problems))
-
How do novices and experts tend to differ in categorization
of problems? (Novices categorize based on superficial properties of the
problems whereas experts categorize based on deeper relationships)
-
What are some principles of developing expertise that seem
to be essentially universal? (One must go through a novice stage, a large
amount of deliberate practice, strong commitment, good guidance or support,
self-confidence)
Questions on the last section
-
What is essential for an argument to be valid? (If the premises
are true, the conclusion must be true)
-
What is essential for an argument to be sound? (The argument
must be valid and the premises must be true)
-
What is the essence of formal logic? (The form of the premises
and conclusion have to be right. The content of the propositions in the
argument is irrelevant for formal logic)
-
What is the 'atmosphere effect? (The quantifiers 'all' 'not'
or 'some' in the premises bias the reasoner to accept the same quantifier
in the conclusion)
More outline to come--the form is not yet clear.
return to syllabus